1 INTRODUCTION

In a volatile competitive business landscape, achieving digital innovation transcends simple technology adoption; it necessitates a profound restructuring of operational models and value delivery mechanisms. Established enterprises often grapple with ingrained processes and mindsets that are resistant to transformation. However, embracing this evolution is pivotal for safeguarding enduring competitive advantage amidst dynamic market conditions.

Initiating digital innovation demands a meticulously crafted vision and strategic roadmap. Departing from conventional approaches, organisations must imbue agility and a culture of continuous improvement. Upgrading technological frameworks represents only the initial phase; concurrently, restructuring organisational frameworks is imperative to fully bolster digital initiatives.

Central to this metamorphosis is unwavering commitment from the leadership team. They must spearhead digital innovation efforts while fostering an environment conducive to cross-functional collaboration and perpetual learning. Prioritising cultivating digital competencies and instilling an entrepreneurial ethos will unleash the workforce’s full potential.

Surviving and thriving in the digital era necessitates more than technological integration—it mandates a paradigm shift in organisational ethos. Embrace change, invest in human capital, and nurture a culture that fosters innovation. This strategic approach will fortify your organisation’s leadership position within the industry, ensuring sustained success in the long term.

2 UNDERSTANDING DIGITAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY

Digital innovation capability refers to a company’s ability to create value by integrating digital technologies. This could mean developing new products, services, processes, or business models (Hund et al., 2021). Companies like Google and Amazon have this capability built into their DNA, but for traditional, product-centric companies, it’s a different story.

Digital innovation can blur the lines between physical and digital, creating new opportunities and competitive pressures. For example, mechanical engineering or manufacturing companies, which have traditionally focused on physical products, now face the challenge of integrating digital technologies into their core offerings (de Massis et al., 2018; Williams et al., 2022). This shift requires a complete rethinking of their business models, processes, and capabilities.

THE DYNAMIC CAPABILITY VIEW

We will look at the dynamic capability view to understand how established companies can develop digital innovation capability. This perspective, introduced by David Teece and colleagues, suggests that companies can adapt and thrive in changing environments by developing three key capabilities: sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring.

i. Sensing involves scanning the environment for new opportunities and threats. For digital innovation, this means keeping an eye on technological advancements and understanding how they can create value (Teece, 2007).

ii. Seizing is about taking advantage of these opportunities. This might involve developing new products, forming strategic alliances, or investing in new technologies (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000).

iii. Reconfiguring involves changing the company’s structure, processes, and resources to exploit new opportunities. This could mean adopting new business models or reorganising teams to better support digital initiatives (Teece et al., 1997).

MICRO-FOUNDATIONS OF DIGITAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY

To develop these dynamic capabilities, companies should focus on specific micro-foundations. These skills, processes, structures, and resources enable sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring:

i. Digital Focus: This means having clear digital innovation goals and strategies. It involves setting explicit targets for digital projects and ensuring that resources are allocated to support these initiatives (Lokuge et al., 2019). A strong digital focus helps guide employees in their innovation-related decisions and activities.

ii. Digital Innovation Process: Companies need mechanisms to support agile and flexible development processes. This involves organisational agility, adaptability, and ambidexterity. Agile processes allow companies to quickly respond to changes in the environment and integrate new digital innovation opportunities (Del Giudice et al., 2021; Troise et al., 2022).

iii. Digital Mindset: Beyond resources and processes, a digital mindset is crucial. This means having a shared understanding and knowledge about the potential of digital technologies. It also involves fostering an entrepreneurial climate where employees feel empowered to explore new digital opportunities (Huber et al., 2020; Nambisan et al., 2017).

iv. Digital Technology Adoption and Data Management: This involves having the right IT infrastructure and digital platforms and the ability to utilise them effectively. Companies need to be able to collect, analyse, and interpret data to create value. Clear responsibilities and coordination mechanisms are essential for data-driven decision-making (Sedera et al., 2016; Yoo et al., 2012).

v. Digital Innovation Network: Companies will engage with various partners, including IT vendors, consultants, suppliers, and customers. This requires mechanisms to assess which technologies originate internally and which should come from external partners. Effective collaboration with external partners is critical to sensing new opportunities and transforming the company’s structures and processes (Abrell et al., 2016).

vi. Overcoming Digital Innovation Resistance: Resistance to change is a common challenge in established companies. Overcoming this resistance involves addressing cultural and organisational barriers. Companies need to create an environment where digital innovation is embraced and supported by all employees (König et al., 2013; Ceipek et al., 2021).

vii. Data Management: In the digital age, data is a critical asset. Effective data management involves collecting, storing, analysing, and leveraging data to drive innovation. Companies need robust data management practices to support data-driven decision-making and create new value from data (Huber et al., 2020; Dąbrowska et al., 2022).

3 IMPLEMENTING DIGITAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY

Building digital innovation capability is not a one-time project. It’s an ongoing process that requires continuous effort and commitment. Here are some steps companies can take to start developing these capabilities:

i. Set Clear Digital Goals: Define what digital innovation means for your company and set specific, measurable goals. Ensure these goals align with your business strategy (Lokuge et al., 2019).

ii. Invest in Technology: Allocate resources to build IT infrastructure and digital platforms. Invest in technologies supporting your digital innovation initiatives (Annarelli et al., 2021).

iii. Foster a Digital Mindset: Encourage a culture of innovation and digital thinking. Provide training and development opportunities to help employees build their digital skills and knowledge (Huber et al., 2020).

iv. Build Agile Processes: Implement agile development processes for flexibility and rapid iteration. Ensure your innovation processes can quickly adapt to changing conditions and new opportunities (Nambisan et al., 2017; Pe˜na H¨aufler et al., 2021).

v. Engage with Partners: Build relationships with external partners who can support your digital innovation efforts. This could include technology vendors, consultants, suppliers, and customers (Abrell et al., 2016).

vi. Manage Data Effectively: Develop robust data management practices to collect, analyse, and leverage data. Data drives decision-making and creates new value (Sedera et al., 2016).

vii. Address Resistance: Identify and address any barriers to digital innovation within your organisation. This might involve changing organisational structures, processes, or culture (König et al., 2013).

4 EXTENDING THE DIGITAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY FRAMEWORK

To further enhance understanding and implementation of digital innovation capability, let’s delve deeper into the practical aspects of these micro-foundations and how they can be effectively leveraged.

DEEP DIVE INTO DIGITAL FOCUS

Digital focus is not just about setting goals; it’s about embedding digital objectives into the company’s fabric. This means:

• Strategic Alignment: Ensuring digital innovation goals align with the company’s strategic objectives (Chen et al., 2017). This alignment helps in prioritising projects that offer the most significant strategic impact.

• Resource Allocation: Allocating both financial and human resources to digital initiatives. This might involve creating dedicated teams, or departments focused solely on digital innovation (Füller et al., 2022).

• Leadership Commitment: Securing buy-in from top leadership to champion digital initiatives. Leadership commitment is crucial for driving change and overcoming resistance (Gfrerer et al., 2021).

ENHANCING THE DIGITAL INNOVATION PROCESS

A robust digital innovation process is critical to responding quickly to market changes. Consider the following:

i. Agile Methodologies: Implementing agile methodologies that allow for rapid development and iteration. Agile frameworks such as Scrum or Kanban can be beneficial (Nambisan et al., 2017).

ii. Cross-Functional Teams: Encouraging collaboration across departments to bring diverse perspectives into the innovation process. Cross-functional teams can help break down silos and foster a more integrated approach to innovation (Troise et al., 2022).

iii. Continuous Improvement: Establishing a culture of continuous improvement where feedback loops are integral to the process. Regular retrospectives and feedback sessions can help refine processes and outcomes (Schultz et al., 2019).

CULTIVATING A DIGITAL MINDSET

Building a digital mindset involves more than just training; it requires a cultural shift:

i. Training and Development: Offering ongoing training programs to keep employees updated on the latest digital trends and technologies (Huber et al., 2020).

ii. Empowerment: Empowering employees to experiment with new ideas without fear of failure. Encouraging a fail-fast approach can lead to faster innovation cycles (Lokuge et al., 2019).

iii. Leadership by Example: The leadership team should model digital behaviours and champion digital initiatives. Their involvement and enthusiasm can significantly influence the overall organisational mindset (Dąbrowska et al., 2022).

STRENGTHENING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION AND DATA MANAGEMENT

Effective technology adoption and data management are critical for leveraging digital innovation:

i. Infrastructure Investment: Investing in robust IT infrastructure that supports digital initiatives. This includes cloud computing, data analytics platforms, and cybersecurity measures (Sedera et al., 2016).

ii. Data Governance: Implementing strong policies to ensure data quality, security, and compliance. Clear data usage and management guidelines can enhance trust and reliability (Yoo et al., 2012).

iii. Analytics and Insights: Leveraging advanced analytics to gain insights from data. Data-driven decision-making should be at the core of digital innovation efforts (Huber et al., 2020).

5 BUILDING AND MANAGING DIGITAL INNOVATION NETWORKS

Collaboration with external partners can amplify digital innovation efforts:

i. Strategic Partnerships: Forming strategic partnerships with technology vendors, startups, and research institutions. These collaborations can provide access to new technologies and expertise (Abrell et al., 2016).

ii. Open Innovation: Embracing open innovation practices that encourage external contributions to innovation. Platforms for crowdsourcing ideas and co-creating with customers can be highly effective (Lyytinen et al., 2016).

iii. Ecosystem Management: Managing a diverse ecosystem of partners to ensure alignment and synergy. This involves regular communication, joint planning sessions, and collaborative goal-setting (Svahn et al., 2017).

Overcoming Resistance To Digital Innovation

Addressing resistance is crucial for successful digital transformation:

i. Change Management: Implementing structured change management processes to guide the organisation through digital transformation. This includes clear communication, training, and support mechanisms (König et al., 2013).

ii. Cultural Transformation: Shifting the organisational culture to one that values and supports digital innovation. This might involve redefining values, norms, and reward systems to align with digital goals (Ceipek et al., 2021).

iii. Employee Involvement: Involving employees in the innovation process from the outset. This can increase buy-in and reduce resistance as employees feel more connected to the change (Dąbrowska et al., 2022).

6 SUPER METRICS FOR LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE IN DRIVING DIGITAL INNOVATION AND EXECUTION: IMPLEMENTATION AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE TARGETS

By focusing on the micro-foundations of digital focus, innovation processes, mindset, technology adoption, data management, and overcoming resistance, companies can develop the dynamic capabilities needed to sense, seize, and reconfigure opportunities presented by digital technologies.

Building these capabilities requires a strategic approach, ongoing investment, and a commitment to cultural transformation. With these elements in place, organisations can effectively harness the power of digital innovation to create lasting value and maintain a competitive edge in a rapidly evolving market.

Organisations can transform their operations, culture, and market positioning through continuous effort and dedication, ensuring long-term success in the digital era:

i. DIGITAL ADOPTION RATE
• Implementation: Track the percentage of digital tools and platforms adopted by the organisation relative to the total available tools within the company’s digital strategy. Regularly update and review adoption metrics.
• High-Performance Target: Achieve an 85% adoption rate of new digital tools and platforms within one year.

ii. Innovation Pipeline Health
• Implementation: Measure the number and quality of innovative ideas in the pipeline, including those in the development and implementation stages. Use a scoring system to assess each idea’s potential impact and feasibility.
• High-Performance Target: Maintain a pipeline with at least 10 high-potential innovations at any given time, with a quarterly increase of 10%.

iii. Time to Market for Digital Initiatives
• Implementation: Track the time taken from the inception of a digital initiative to its market launch. Implement agile project management methodologies to shorten this timeline.
• High-Performance Target: Reduce the time to market for digital initiatives to less than six months.

iv. Execution Efficiency
• Implementation: Measure the percentage of digital projects completed on time and within budget. Use project management tools to track progress and identify bottlenecks.
• High-Performance Target: Achieve 90% on-time and on-budget completion rate for digital projects annually.

v. Innovation Implementation Rate
• Implementation: Assess the ratio of innovative ideas progressing from concept to implementation. Monitor the success rate and identify factors contributing to or hindering implementation.
• High-Performance Target: Ensure 70% of high-potential innovative ideas are implemented within one year.

vi. Digital Skill Development
• Implementation: Assess the percentage of employees who have completed digital skills training and certifications. Incorporate digital competency evaluations into regular performance reviews.
• High-Performance Target: Ensure 90% of employees have completed advanced digital skills training within 12 months.

vii. Cultural Transformation Index
• Implementation: Develop an index to measure cultural transformation, including metrics on employee engagement, openness to change, and alignment with digital innovation goals. Conduct regular surveys and focus groups.
• High-Performance Target: Achieve an 80% positive rating on the cultural transformation index within two years.

HOW TO IMPLEMENT THESE METRICS

i. Digital Adoption Rate: Ensure regular training and support for employees to use new digital tools effectively. Create an adoption dashboard to monitor progress and address any barriers promptly.

ii. Innovation Pipeline Health: Establish an innovation task force to continuously source, evaluate, and nurture new ideas. Use innovation management software to track progress and outcomes.

iii. Time to Market for Digital Initiatives: Implement agile methodologies and streamline approval processes to accelerate the development and launch of digital projects.

iv. Execution Efficiency: Utilise project management tools to track timelines and budgets rigorously. Conduct regular project reviews to identify and mitigate risks early.

v. Innovation Implementation Rate: Foster a culture that encourages experimentation and risk-taking. Provide the necessary resources and support to transition ideas from concept to reality.

vi. Digital Skill Development: Offer ongoing training programs, workshops, and access to online courses. Encourage a culture of continuous learning through incentives and recognition.

vii. Cultural Transformation Index: Regularly assess cultural metrics through surveys and feedback mechanisms. Implement targeted initiatives to address areas of resistance and promote a culture of innovation.

7 CONCLUSION

Digital innovation capability is not an optional add-on but a critical requirement for established companies aiming to thrive in the digital age. By focusing on the micro-foundations of digital focus, innovation processes, mindset, technology adoption, data management, and overcoming resistance, companies can develop the dynamic capabilities needed to sense, seize, and reconfigure opportunities presented by digital technologies.

Building these capabilities requires a strategic approach, ongoing investment, and a commitment to cultural transformation. With these elements in place, established companies can effectively harness the power of digital innovation to create lasting value and maintain a competitive edge in a rapidly evolving market.

Companies can transform their operations, culture, and market positioning through continuous effort and dedication, ensuring long-term success in the digital era.

Citations

  1. Abrell, T., Pihlajamaa, M., Kanto, L., Vom Brocke, J., Uebernickel, F., 2016. The role of users and customers in digital innovation: insights from B2B manufacturing firms. Inf. Manage. 53, 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.12.005.
  2. Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., Nonino, F., Parida, V., Pessot, E., 2021. Literature review on digitalization capabilities: co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 166, 120635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635.
  3. Ceipek, R., Hautz, J., de Massis, A., Matzler, K., Ardito, L., 2021. Digital transformation through exploratory and exploitative internet of things innovations: the impact of family management and technological diversification. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 38, 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12551.
  4. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Benitez, J., Kou, G., 2017. Improving strategic flexibility with information technologies: insights for firm performance in an emerging economy. J. Inf. Technol. 32, 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.26.
  5. Dąbrowska, J., Almpanopoulou, A., Brem, A., Chesbrough, H., Cucino, V., Di Minin, A., Giones, F., Hakala, H., Marullo, C., Mention, A., Mortara, L., Nørskov, S., Nylund, P. A., Oddo, C.M., Radziwon, A., Ritala, P., 2022. Digital transformation, for better or worse: a critical multi-level research agenda. RD Manag., radm.12531. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12531.
  6. Del Giudice, M., Scuotto, V., Papa, A., Tarba, S.Y., Bresciani, S., Warkentin, M., 2021. A self-tuning model for smart manufacturing SMEs: effects on digital innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 38, 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12560.
  7. de Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., Kammerlander, N., 2018. Innovation with limited resources: management lessons from the German Mittelstand. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 35, 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12373.
  8. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A., 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg. Manag. J. 21, 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E.
  9. Füller, J., Hutter, K., Wahl, J., Bilgram, V., Tekic, Z., 2022. How AI revolutionizes innovation management – perceptions and implementation preferences of AI-based innovators. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 178, 121598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121598.
  10. Gfrerer, A., Hutter, K., Füller, J., Ströhle, T., 2021. Ready or not: managers’ and employees’ different perceptions of digital readiness. Calif. Manage. Rev. 63, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620977487.
  11. Huber, F., Wainwright, T., Rentocchini, F., 2020. Open data for open innovation: managing absorptive capacity in SMEs. RD Manag. 50, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12347.
  12. Hund, A., Wagner, H.-T., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., 2021. Digital innovation: review and novel perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 30, 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101695.
  13. König, A., Kammerlander, N., Enders, A., 2013. The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Acad. Manage. Rev. 38, 418–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162.
  14. Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., Dongming, X., 2019. Organizational readiness for digital innovation: development and empirical calibration of a construct. Inf. Manage. 56, 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001.
  15. Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., Song, M., 2017. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q. 41, 223–228.
  16. Peña Haufler, B., Globocnik, D., Landaeta Saldías, P., Salomo, S., 2021. Rapid validity testing at the front end of innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 38, 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12585.
  17. Schultz, C., Globocnik, D., Kock, A., Salomo, S., 2019. Application and performance impact of stage-gate systems – the role services in the firm’s business focus. RD Manag. 49, 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12341.
  18. Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, Suprateek, Sarker, Saonee, 2016. Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: a contingent resource-based theory view. Inf. Manage. 53, 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001.
  19. Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., Lindgren, R., 2017a. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Q. 41, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.12.
  20. Teece, D.J., 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.
  21. Troise, C., Corvello, V., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., 2022. How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: the role of agility in the digital transformation era. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 174, 121227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121227.
  22. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K., 2010. Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322.
  23. Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., 2012. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23, 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771.
  24. Williams, C.A., Schallmo, D., Scornavacca, E., 2022. How applicable are digital maturity models to SMEs?: a conceptual framework and empirical validation approach. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 26, 2240010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622400102.